Impossible install
Forum » General / Discussion » Impossible install
started by: SadrSadr
on: 1204313066|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
number of posts: 10
rss icon RSS: new posts
summary:
It's all just one big mess for non-technical users!
Impossible install
SadrSadr 1204313066|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

Since Wikidot v1 was first released for download my excitement bar has dropped rapidly ever since…

I won't be going into detail about this, because it's dead simple: As long as wikidot can't be installed the same way you do it with applications like Joomla! and SMF, I don't see myself ever putting Wikidot to use. I allowed myself to get thrilled once again when I saw the news here about the installation being much simpler now. Then I see that I have to use some other program that I am nowhere familiar with, and I have to follow some 15 steps in order to complete an install that completely baffles me, and leaves me thinking with such questions as "Is it 100% sure that this won't leave my computer much more vulnerable to outside attacks?". Why couldn't you just have made yet another nice web application that can be uploaded to your web host or put in your www WAMP folder, and installed in the matter of a few mouseclicks? The kind that you can find on http://www.opensourcecms.com/
If I wanted a really bloated wiki, I'd go for DekiWiki

For a while, Wikidot seemed to be heading in the right, no, the perfect direction according to my needs. Now, I fear that I'll have to start looking for an alternative, as I don't think I'll ever see the day when I can singlehandedly install Wikidot, without the help of some webby-wiseguy.

(Okay, ranting a bit, I'm sorry, but I just had so high hopes for this software so seeing how things have developed lately has kinda brought me down that's all. Had some big plans for this application you know)

last edited on 1204313179|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover by Sadr + show more
unfold Impossible install by SadrSadr, 1204313066|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
Re: Impossible install
gwplgwpl 1204366259|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

Nobody said that wikidot is only right way. There are many products on the market, cause need are varying and each user have other priorities.

For those how complains about difficulties related with installation I think a nice movement is Virtual Machine solution: Virtual Machine to make installation (much) easier.

unfold Re: Impossible install by gwplgwpl, 1204366259|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
Re: Impossible install
Ed JohnsonEd Johnson 1204427480|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

You may be right that the Virtual machine option may be easier, but there needs to be a step-by-step guide for doing this. I tried it, it failed, and I had no idea where to start with trouble-shooting. Then I had to go on vacation! ;)

I think Sadr's point is a fair one. Wikidot needs to mature to the point that it can be easily installed on the majority of web hosts out there if it's going to gain mainstream popularity like others (Joomla!, Drupal, TikiWiki, etc.).

-Ed

unfold Re: Impossible install by Ed JohnsonEd Johnson, 1204427480|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
Re: Impossible install
Ed JohnsonEd Johnson 1204426746|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

If you've been spending any time here, you can see that I've easily been the most vocal, and probably the most active one trying to get a successful install working. I too have been very frustrated at times, and still am bugged that I can't get this thing working "as advertised" on my own server. Although I've done some software development in the past, I've ventured way out of my comfort zone and have spent more time than I cared to trying to get things working. I really want to use Wikidot for a work-related project. I have a lot of time invested and don't want to see that go to waste. That being said, if I can't get the last few issues I'm having resolved soon, I'll reluctantly be "shopping" for something else to use for my project at work.

I totally understand your point - having the ability to install Wikidot on most linux-based web hosts would go a long way toward building Wikidot's popularity even more. I'm willing and able to load and run Wikidot on my own server, but I can totally understand the frustration from those who can't operate this way.

-Ed

unfold Re: Impossible install by Ed JohnsonEd Johnson, 1204426746|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
Re: Impossible install
GabrysGabrys 1204452726|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

Wikidot installation can't be as easy as dropping something somewhere. Wikidot relies on many components. You need a webserver, database server, customized PHP installation and much much more.

We aim to create the best wiki ever and not the easiest-to-install wiki ever. Those two things are kind of in opposite to each other.

You can go for something like Joomla or OpenCMS but wait, are they feature-rich wiki-farms?

Image you want to create a new site with Joomla, you need to duplicate all files, change vhosts files and many other things. With wikidot you JUST CREATE A NEW SITE. Joomla is not the same as Wikidot, and the fact it's easier to install implies it's harder to maintain, so the choice is your. I hope you'll chose Wikidot and let us know what you think about it.

Moreover, as Ed said, with the Virtual Machine things are getting easier and easier.

And hey, this is just about a FIRST release of Wikidot OpenSource. We created a detailed HOWTO about installing it, to let people know HOW it works. Ed created some time ago custom BASH scripts that do all dirty work for you.

Anyways, if we hadn't release our code, would YOU be happier?

unfold Re: Impossible install by GabrysGabrys, 1204452726|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
Re: Impossible install
SadrSadr 1204459539|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

We aim to create the best wiki ever and not the easiest-to-install wiki ever. Those two things are kind of in opposite to each other.

Ehm, hate to break the bubble for you here, but those two are far from opposites, they should rather go hand in hand! It all depends on the user-base you're aiming for. It's impossible to be the 'it' for one and all, which is where Wikidot has come to an ever so little crossroad here now. If you want the use of Wikidot to grow outside your own hosted community, you'll have to join the common playingfield instead of trying to invite everyone else to your own.

Also, don't compare Wikidot to Joomla!, they're meant for two completely seperate purposes, as you so neatly put it yourself really. Compare it with WikkaWiki, WikyBlog, DokuWiki, PmWiki, TWiki and TikiWiki. All can be installed in a matter of some simple steps. No, they are not quite as featurefilled as Wikidot, but wikis/blogs such as WikyBlog does make nice use of JavaScript, and with a bigger community and more extensions made, it could probably come close to what Wikidot v1 is to-date, while still being very easy to install at any standard web server. It is here, that Wikidot just plain fails to join the ranks of the other most populer open source web applications. It's not a matter of how featurefilled it is, or how easy it is to do a otherwise complex action with Wikidot. This all breaks in pieces when the average user can't even install it on his web server.

Anyways, if we hadn't release our code, would YOU be happier?

As a non-developer, yes, most definately. If you are indeed planning to make the wikidot install work as with any other popular web application in the end, then I would advise you to not make releases like this and give people like me the completely wrong idea. The first release should reflect the basics of how the application works, and the reflection of Wikidot as it stands does not appeal to me. I want to know what will be of this application right now, so that I can either start looking for a better alternative, or keep in waiting, knowing that it's not in vain, which is the opposite of what it's felt like up to this point. I regret waiting.

Example

I'd like to make an example of what I always imagined Wikidot to be like in the end. I find Wordpress to be quite ideal for this purpose, seeing as blogs are to a great degree the equivalent of wikis, in the sense that people can join up, write and submit content freely, and have all these submissions sorted neatly by the application itself.

Scenario #1: Wordpress

By many, considered 'the best Blogging-solution out there', both as a free blog-provider, and as completely free, open source software. Wordpress' user-aim is on the average user, all the way up to the advanced, but that's where they sometimes fail at some areas. High-tech users have many more preferences and special features deciding what makes an application fit for them, whereas to the low, or really non-tech user, ease-of-use and the most popular features working nicely is all you'll look at.

Wordpress offers a nice range of different solutions for all these kinds of people who want a nice applicationg for free. You start off with basic blogging on their free server, then you start learning how to add extensions, add themes, and maybe even customize them a little bit. At some point you might feel like 'braking loose', and Wordpress is by no means trying to hold you back here, as they offer their software for free as well. All you have to do now is find a server, and learn the basics for installing a web application online. You are now entering the ranks of the slightly more techy. At this point you might be learning more about extensions, themes and web development in general. In the end, you'll even be ready for new applications, because many of the things you did when you used Wordpress are pretty much exactly the same for other similar and popular web applications out there.

Scenario #2: Wikidot

Different kinds of people would really end up on the same dead end here. Here are some examples of these people:

  • That guy who used a couple of applications before this, figured out how to install them, and quickly realized that it's all pretty much the same. I'm that guy.
  • That guy who joined some online communities, noticed that other communities were using the very same software, tries and grows fond of Wikidot, sees that it's free of charge and downloadable; comes to the conclusion that he wants to make his own little community site, like those other guys he'd seen did it.
  • That guy who joined Wikidot.com as his first experience with a wiki and open source web applications. He plays around with wikidot for about a year, enjoying the hell out of all the features it offers, and doesn't see how it could be any better. His community grows, and he suddenly realizes that he'd like to buy his own domain with less restrictions, and so he educates himself about the basic web dev knowledge you need to install these other similar web applications and he's finally ready to give it a shot.

Common conclusion:
Oh bloody hell… It seems either requires a program we've never laid hands on before and then follow countless confusing steps that hardly seem to be the same for case, or we'll have to install and get used to Unix systems all of a sudden, and get a good enough understanding of both Unix systems and Wikidot in order to stand ready for any difficulties we might encounter on the way to the grand install…

Now this whole ordeal could probably be made a whole lot less frustrating if the famed creator of Wikidot could make one of his somewhat rare appearances at this forum.

last edited on 1204461666|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover by Sadr + show more
unfold Re: Impossible install by SadrSadr, 1204459539|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
Re: Impossible install
hartnellhartnell 1205226099|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

My 2 cents. :)

I used to use MediaWiki (uggghhh…) and once upon a time it wasn't very easy to use for the end user either. I remember how they used to pompously write all their docs as if you had your own dedicated host to work with.

Wikidot will come along, probably much better than MediaWiki because the team started the project with open source in mind from the start. MediaWiki was (as I seem to recall) grew out of another project.

— Shawn

unfold Re: Impossible install by hartnellhartnell, 1205226099|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
Re: Impossible install
hartnellhartnell 1205226161|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

I still cringe when I think of the crap I had to go through with MediaWiki back in the day.

— Shawn

unfold Re: Impossible install by hartnellhartnell, 1205226161|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
Re: Impossible install
SadrSadr 1206280806|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

Due to the game project I'm a part of I'm an avid user of MediaWiki myself, and it kills a little part of me every day that I use it… Still, you seem to be leaving out the big thing that currently sets these two applications apart: MediaWiki can be installed on pretty much any web-host, even most free ones, in a few simple mouseclicks, basically no web development knowledge needed. Whereas Wikidot requires a whooole lot more know-how in order to even get close…

What also brings me down is the fact that the main developer behind this software still haven't found it in him to come by this thread and make a proper reply, trying to clear up in a few things here. I think many important issues have been raised here, but noone seems very interested in addressing them.

unfold Re: Impossible install by SadrSadr, 1206280806|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
Re: Impossible install
SadrSadr 1208095248|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

Checking for life…

You guys (assuming you are infact still a group of developers working on this together now) are in serious need of a project manager, and I'd be happy to volunteer, free of charge. My only requirement would be communication…

unfold Re: Impossible install by SadrSadr, 1208095248|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
new post
Unless stated otherwise Content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License